Setting the Cut: ESG Compliance at Financial Institutions
08/07/2026
Published in "Compliance Berater" (CB), Issue 08/2026. The concluding Part 3 turns operational, tracing the full path from norm to lived practice. It shows how institutions translate the requirements of CRD VI, EBA guidelines and the 9th MaRisk amendment into an audit-proof process: from integration into risk strategy and risk appetite, through "forward looking" regulatory monitoring, to the proportionality matrix for risk-based clustering of legal domains. The contribution by Prof. Dr. Frank Passing, Markus Müller and Finn Brüggemann is rounded out by a compliance synopsis that structures and contrasts the tasks and framework conditions of the Regulatory/MaRisk compliance function, also available on the Fairfield & Archer website.

The first two parts of our series of expert articles in #ComplianceBerater have traced the regulatory framework and the shift from MaRisk compliance to regulatory compliance. The concluding third part (CB 8/2026) takes an operational approach: How do institutions translate the requirements of CRD VI, EBA guidelines, and the 9th MaRisk amendment into a robust, audit-ready process?
The article by Prof. Dr. Frank Passing, Markus Müller, and Finn Brüggemann traces the entire path from regulation to practical implementation:
The article is supplemented by a compliance synopsis that provides a structured comparison of the tasks and framework conditions of the regulatory/MaRisk compliance function—a practical tool for understanding the national and supranational requirements for the function at a glance. The synopsis is also available on the Fairfield & Archer website.
Published in Compliance-Berater (CB) 8/2026.
To the article (German only):
https://online.ruw.de/dfv-xaver/ruw/start.xav#/text/CB_2026_08%2FCB_2026_08_b8?_ts=1784108759176
Resources
08/07/2026
01/07/2026
01/05/2026